|
|
| From: ABC Classic FM fan |
12/07/00
12:15:13
|
| Subject: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97562
|
I wonder, I wonder... why is
it that most string instruments I can think of (guitars, banjos, violins,
violas, cellos, double basses etc) require the right-handed musician to
use their left hand for the actual fingering (getting the notes),
and their right one for plucking, bowing etc (which seems the easier
task)? I would have thought that the right hand would have been better
suited to such acrobatics - after all, that's the hand a right-hander
prefers to use for writing, object manipulation, etc. If all this
right-hemisphere, left-hemisphere stuff has anything to it, wouldn't
getting the notes be the more mathematical task, and the plucking/bowing
the more creative task? And do left-handers usually play mirror image
instruments? Any left-handed virtuosos that don't? I was just wondering
whether it might be an advantage to play particularly classical music the
other way around to convention. And I say particularly classical music
because for a violinist, for example, the "feel" and the expressiveness
component to the music is actually created mainly by how they bow.
Transients to notes which give instruments, instrument players and singers
their characteristic "voices" aren't created by the fingering
either.
Thank you.
|
| From: Carmel ® |
12/07/00
12:30:41
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97571
|
require
the right-handed musician to use their left hand for the actual
fingering (getting the notes), and their right one for plucking, bowing
etc (which seems the easier task)?
Okay, I never
actually played a string instrument, but I spent enough time around them.
Bascially because the action the ACTUALLY makes the music is
bowing/plucking/strumming, this is the action you need to have greatest
control over. The fingering (such as with a violin) only requires small,
deft movements of the fingers, which are easy to train (for example,
typing is relatively easy to train you left fingers to move deftly very
short distances to certain places). Bowing requires a fluid, co-ordinated
motion, which is usually much easier to acheive with your dominant side.
Brass instruments, like trumpet, trombone and tuba all use the
left hand/arm to support the instrument, and the right hand to guide the
making of the music, for example with a trombone, the presice movement of
the slide to the correct position (which can be tricky as there are no
frets or markings and the slide is kept well greased and slippery so that
you can move quickly btn notes... it also means you have to have immense
control over where you go)
I would have thought
that the right hand would have been better suited to such acrobatics -
after all, that's the hand a right-hander prefers to use for writing,
object manipulation, etc.
Which is exactly why the dominant
hand (usually right) is used for the parts that rewuire greatest control.
As we moving the slide of a trombone, bowing with a violin requires
movement of a certain pressure, length and, um, flourish I guess, to get
the desired effect. The movent of the left hand is far simpler and much
more of a regimented pattern (hence easy to train)
And do left-handers usually play mirror image instruments?
Some do, but most don't. For the most part, it is because
the instruments are built to cater for right-handed people. And just like
you can teach a left-handed person to right with their right hand, to
throw or to catch, to bat or bowl with their right hand, you can teach
them to do play music with their right.
I hope this helped a bit...
|
| From: James Richmond
(Avatar) |
12/07/00
12:32:36
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97572
|
I think you've answered your own
question! You say
[F]for a violinist, for
example, the "feel" and the expressiveness component to the music is
actually created mainly by how they bow. Transients to notes which give
instruments, instrument players and singers their characteristic "voices"
aren't created by the fingering either.
Therefore, it may be
more important to control the bow with one's "better"
hand.
However, it has been shown that instrumentalists tend to have
better developed brain regions for controlling the parts of their bodies
which they need to control precisely in playing their instruments. Even a
naturally right handed violinist has excellent control over their left
hand, which is probably qualitatively different from that of a left hander
who does not play the violin.
I would also be interested to know
how many virtuoso violinists have their violins strung "in reverse" and
use the opposite hands to play. I think the number would be virtually
zero. There are two reasons for this. The first lies in the teaching of
the proper bowing and fingering, which would be much harder if the student
had to mirror the teacher. The second lies in the practicalities of
orchestras. Imagine having a string section with some left handers and
some right handers - bows would
clash!
JR
|
| From: Kothos ® |
12/07/00
12:32:38
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97573
|
Maybe the right hand is
better at maintaining rythm? Most people who are right handed can tap out
a complex beat with their right hand but can only provide a simple
accompaniment with their left.
So since plucking/strumming the
strings provides the rythm and timing, it has to be done with the right,
leaving the left with the difficult chore of learning the complex finger
positions?
Anyway, just a guess.
|
| From: Scooter ® |
12/07/00
12:41:11
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97582
|
And do
left-handers usually play mirror image instruments?
I am
a left hander. When I was 6 my mother took me to my first guitar lesson. I
picked up the guitar in the lft handed (Paul McCartney) manner. The
teacher said that was cool he could restring the guit for me. But my
mother didn't want him to worry about it and told him to teach me right
handed, which he did. Now I can't pick up a guitar left handed. I play
right handed.
|
| From: Carmel ® |
12/07/00
12:41:46
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97583
|
ooooo!
That was the
example I was thinking of!
Piano. Both hands of a pianist are
equally important. Same for flutes, saxes, clarinets and drums.
These instruments require small, deft movements that are well
controlled. Somewhat like typing. There is no dominant hand, really. It is
only when you have an instrument that requires an great deal of fluidity
and control that you get the concept of handedness to the extent you are
talking about.
|
| From: Carmel ® |
12/07/00
12:45:42
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97587
|
same with my brother. He's
left-handed eating and writing, but plays both trumpet and guitar
right-handed.
Simply because it was easier to teach him that
way.
Me? I can play trombone left or right handed. I just put it
together differently. Usually takes about 10 or15 minutes for me to cope
with the left-handed change, but after that, I'm fine. I taught myself how
to do it when I was little, I thought it would be
cool.
|
| From: Cybernaut ® |
12/07/00
12:46:33
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97588
|
I play the 5-string banjo (with
right handed aspect). The left hand dexterity seems to me to be more
important than the right. As much as pickin' seems complicated, once the
appropriate motor skills have been honed, the left hand is the weak link
in the chain. I also touch type; again, once the appropriate motor
skills have been trained, their are no
problems.
|
| From: James Richmond
(Avatar) |
12/07/00
12:47:32
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97589
|
I'm right handed and I play
piano. I find it much easier to play complex music with my right hand than
my left, and have to concentrate a lot to make my left hand do what it is
supposed to when something difficult is happening on that side.
Fortunately, most of the hot action on piano is in the upper register
anyway, which is the right hand. I'm just glad things aren't the other way
round.
Mind you, there are many excellent pianists who are
otherwise left handed.
JR
|
| From: Scooter ® |
12/07/00
12:57:40
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97594
|
Simply because
it was easier to teach him that way.
I am not sure I agree
Carmel. I think it would be easier to teach a left hander (if you are
right handed), because the student would be sitting opposite the
instructor and would just copy his movements straight over (mirror image)
instead of try to transpose them over to the right hand (does that make
sense?)
|
| From: ABC Classic FM fan |
12/07/00
13:12:39
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97599
|
Well, thanks for all those
fast and detailed replies. I personally think the fingering on the violin
requires a great deal more dexterity of the fingers than the
bowing. However, the bowing requires enormous control of the arm,
and sometimes you think your arm is going to fall off any moment -
particularly when you have to play complex rhythms and you're going from
one string to the next and back again having to avoid clashing into other
strings and having to alter the lightness and the speed of contact. But
that's just bowed instruments... Friends of mine play guitars, and what
they do with their right hands doesn't seem nearly as complicated (their
own comments! - but then I watched a virtuoso classical guitarist on a
documentary some weeks ago, and his right hand did rather amazing stuff
too...).
As one of you commented, it is true that if you're a
right-hander playing a stringed instrument, you seem to become far more
ambidextrous. I can do a lot more with my left hand than I ever could
before taking up violin.
A friend who teaches guitar said he taught
a left-handed beginner on a right-handed guitar, and then his uncle gave
him a left-handed guitar some months later, and he just couldn't convert
to it try as he might. So his opinion is that whatever you get used to,
you get used to in that respect.
As a related idea, does anyone
know if any of the famous visual artists were
left-handed?
|
| From: Alan™ ® |
12/07/00
18:37:38
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
97736
|
Although I don't play any musical
instrument, not even the triangle :-(
From my experience of
teaching sailing, caving and climbing, particularly knots with respect to
those activities. Left handers have very good ability to learn things
which ever way you present it to them. They will naturally reverse mirror
to suit their own requirements, alternatively they will learn a skill
right handed, ie. because I didn't have access to left hand golf clubs, I
learnt how to play golf right handed, but put either way depending upon
the slope.
Right handers seem not to be able to do this, it must
be presented to them the right handed way.
As a left hander,
teaching people how to tie knots. I had to learn how to tie knots right
handed. A funny thing happened one day when teaching somebody, without
thinking I started teaching somebody a particular knot left handedly and
the person mirrored my knot(right handedly), at this stage I realised I
was teaching a left hander. Teaching the person after that, was much
simpler.
BTW: the above contains several
generalisations.
|
| From: Paul H. |
13/07/00
14:25:44
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
98254
|
I think you've got some good
answers here already, but here's my 200 cents.
In the West, didn't
string music begin with harp-like instruments? Which *only* use the right
hand? Once this became orthodoxy, isn't is possible that as your
tow-handed instruments came in from the East that they were adopted in a
right-handed way? And as Western culture became dominant, that the
right-handed way fed back to the East?
. As a
related idea, does anyone know if any of the famous visual artists were
left-handed?
Left-handedness and art are practically the
same thing.
Re; the bowline (as an ex-rock-climber). I was on a
boat in Fiji, and idly trying to remember how to tie a bowline and bugger
me if I couldn't. A Fijian watching me, after a bit, said, "are you left
left-handed", "Well, yeah..." He took the rope out of my hands reversed
it, and gave it back to me, and yes, bingo, a two-second
bowline.
|
| From: steve(primus) ® |
13/07/00
14:37:18
|
| Subject: re: Music and
Handedness |
post id:
98260
|
Left-handedness
and art are practically the same thing
Are you saying that
all left-handers are artists? They are not. Are you saying that all
artists are left handed? They are not.
The vast majority of
artists, writers, musicians, sculptors, poets etc are right handed - just
as the vast majority of people are right
handed.
|
This forum is un-moderated. The views and opinions expressed are those of the individual
poster and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove offensive or
inappropriate messages.
|