|
|
| From: John Devers ® |
28/07/2001
22:41:11
|
| Subject: Anti zeno effect? |
post id:
363843
|
Hi, the last time I posted on
this subject was a thread on watched pots do not boil, this was the result
of the zeno effect. Now scientists have discovered that if you watch the
pot too much it can boil faster this is called the anti zeno
effect.
My question is what could you apply the zeno effect to and
then the anti zeno effect to to make an interesting thought
experiment?
Is there any thing important about the zeno effect that
applies to our everyday life?
Would it matter to the laws of
physics if the effect did not exist?
http://www.nature.com/nsu/010719/010719-16.html Watching boils pot
Watching
boils pot Frequent check-ups could stop quantum data decaying. 18
July 2001 ERICA KLARREICH
Checks can push pot over the
top. PhotoDisc Good and bad news for the impatient: a watched pot
can actually boil faster - but look at it too often and it may never boil
at all. In a finding that offers hope for the creation of quantum
computers, a new experiment has vindicated two of the most
counterintuitive theories of quantum physics. The Zeno effect, proposed
more than 20 years ago, predicts that frequent measurements of a quantum
system will slow down or even stop the natural 'decay' of particles from
high-energy states to lower-energy ones. The anti-Zeno effect, proposed
just last year, predicts that numerous measurements may instead speed up
decay. Although radioactive decay is a common phenomenon in the
physical world - it occurs, for instance, when a radioactive atom emits a
beta particle - the Zeno and anti-Zeno effects had never been observed in
any spontaneously decaying system. Now Mark Raizen at the University of
Texas at Austin and his colleagues have recreated both effects in the
laboratory. They trapped sodium atoms in a light wave, creating a
system in which the atoms could escape only by tunnelling. This is a
bizarre quantum effect in which particles pop across an energy barrier
that they should not theoretically have enough energy to overcome. Left to
its own devices, the system would decay slowly, with sodium atoms
tunnelling across the barrier every now and then. When Raizen's team
observed the system every millionth of a second, the tunnelling rate
slowed significantly. When they took measurements every five millionths of
a second, tunnelling speeded up. "The Zeno effect has until now only
been seen in very simple systems, and the anti-Zeno effect has never been
seen," says Abraham Kofman at the Weizmann Institute in Israel, who first
predicted the anti-Zeno effect with colleague Gershon Kurizki. "It's an
outstanding experiment, in the spirit of the original proposal of the Zeno
effect." It may seem paradoxical that mere observation should alter the
course of events. But on the quantum level, it's a fact of life. According
to quantum theory, before a particle is measured, it exists in an
indecisive blur of states, hovering on both sides of a barrier at the same
time. Measuring a particle entails bouncing at least one photon off
it. This creates enough of a disturbance to push a particle into a
definite state, either outside or inside the barrier. Where the particle
lands depends on the timing of the measurement. "Once we measured it,
we prevented a particle from hopping back to the undecided state," says
Martin Fischer, a member of the research team who is now with the New
Jersey-based microelectronics company Agere Systems. The Zeno effect
offers the tantalizing possibility of eventually helping to solve one of
quantum computing's biggest problems: errors arising from the decay of
data. "This paper gives some encouragement, since it shows that it is
possible to achieve the Zeno effect in some cases," Kofman says - in other
words, to halt decay. Zeno was a philosopher of fourth century BC
Greece who argued that motion is impossible.
References Fischer
, M. C.et al. Observation of the Quantum Zeno and Anti-Zeno effects in an
unstable system. Physical Review
Letters
|
This forum is un-moderated. The views and opinions expressed are those
of the individual poster and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove
offensive or inappropriate messages.
|