|
|
| From: John Devers ® |
26/08/00
15:21:13
|
| Subject: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
122959
|
Now that the 5 bit quantum
computer is in use and works, does anyone think that we may have this
quantum computing power available in the brain?
J.D.
|
| From: Edward ® |
26/08/00
15:47:41
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
122973
|
No idea, but people are
always looking for anything that helps explain how the brain
works.
|
| From: Robert ® |
26/08/00
16:30:37
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
122983
|
In our brains?
Parallel
processing - certainly.
Quantum computing - don't think
so
|
| From: John Devers ® |
26/08/00
16:34:50
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
122985
|
Why not? Do you know what a
Josephson junction is? Have you read about superconductivity in
magnetic fields?
J.D.
|
| From: Robert ® |
26/08/00
16:51:10
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
122993
|
As far as I understand it, the
brain works as a lump of *lots* of neurones with *lots* of
interconnections, and there is a synapse at each connection. As the action
potential heads down the axon towards the synapse, it must be above a
certain threshold strength at the synapse or there is too much inhibition
and the signal doesn't get through - the "all or none" principle. I can't
really see any room for something like a superposition of states being
employed in the brain - the neural description seems sufficent. Anyhow,
the brain is far too warm and uncontrolled to have a nice superposition -
surely decoherence would kick in and kill it in a matter of femtoseconds -
that's why they need very cold, insulated and protected machines;
otherwise you lose the superposition and no more funky
quantumness.
|
| From: John Devers ® |
26/08/00
17:04:01
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
122997
|
Quantum software can only be used
once. Once you retrieve the memory, you must make the sft. again the brain
could do this maybe? You could do it in a
femtosecond.
|
| From: John Devers ® |
26/08/00
17:18:26
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
122998
|
Obviously a quantum computer is
making the calculation somewhere, if one quantum computer can not
interfere with another quantum computer in this realm then it may be that
they are calculating in seperate 2d universes or
dimensions.
J.D.
|
| From: John Devers ® |
27/08/00
17:23:59
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
123413
|
Robert,you said this
As the action potential heads down the axon towards
the synapse, it must be above a certain threshold strength at the synapse
or there is too much inhibition and the signal doesn't get through - the
"all or none" principle. I can't really see any room for something like a
superposition of states being employed in the brain have you heard
of virtual electrons this may occure in that "all or none" principle part
of the synapse reaction?
|
| From: Robert ® |
27/08/00
18:05:17
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
123430
|
have you heard
of virtual electrons this may occure in that "all or none" principle part
of the synapse reaction?
Too macroscopic for that (I
think?)
|
| From: Robert ® |
27/08/00
18:26:09
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
123442
|
There is no current - it does
this weird propagation thing where some chemicals go in and some go out,
and you get this spike that goes down the neuron. (great description I
know) :-p
|
| From: Robert ® |
27/08/00
18:33:46
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
123448
|
Yeah - but either the other
neurone fires or it doesn't (or is that a false dichotomy?)
Anyhow,
if we did have a bit of quantum computing power, then wouldn't we all be
decrypting gurus? What two prime numbers are multiplied to give
354,249,234,456,198,130,644,488,786,235? (That was just random, you get
the point)
|
| From: John Devers ® |
27/08/00
18:37:36
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
123450
|
No, because the software must be
written in the brain that isn't in the quantum
world.
|
| From: Robert ® |
27/08/00
18:39:34
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
123453
|
I don't know - what implications
would you expect then if it was true?
|
| From: John Devers ® |
27/08/00
18:49:38
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
123459
|
Just a greater understanding of
where pictures in the mind may be formed and our consciousness is able to
view them. It would also explain why our consciousness is cut off from the
body during death. It may exist outside this 4D world with just one link
from a 2D world that needs the 4D for all the things that can be done in
it.
J.D.
|
| From: John Devers ® |
2/09/00
21:31:04
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
127386
|
Just a small note to add which
may be appropriate to the subject. Organic Superconductors have been
discovered, see Nature 17 aug. 2000 no.6797. These SCs are insulators
that become superconducting when injected with a charge and having their
temperature lowered.
|
| From: John Devers ® |
5/10/00
2:29:03
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
144565
|
Could the brains parrallel
processing be viewed in this way at all? Quantum computers can be
viewed as programable quantum computer interferomiters. Initially prepared
in a superposition of all the possible input states ,the computation
evolves in parrallel along all its possible paths, which will interfere
constructivly towards the desired
output.
|
| From: Robert ® |
5/10/00
11:39:50
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
144710
|
John,
In my opinion - no -
but what if we did make a brain out of a quantum computer!
This is
the way I see it:
The brain is a bunch of neurones that are
interconnected, there are input neurones and output neurones (for each
task). Now, when a certain thought/sensation is processed, there is a
specific path that is 'fired' for that thought/sensation. This is based on
the threshold or all-or-nothing principle I've explained
before.
This can be modelled electronically using a 1 for a fire
and 0 for a miss, and connecting a whole bunch of nodes and setting up
inputs and outputs. This is how your basic Artifical Neural Network (ANN)
works, as I understand it.
Now what if we made the ANN quantum?
Wouldn't we get a sort "sum of all possible paths" effect, so that every
possible thought is experienced at once? Or what would happen?
I
think it would be easier for the artifical brain to be quantum, than for
the organic - simply because of the high demands of getting a functioning
quantum computer in the first
place.
|
| From: James R
(Avatar) |
5/10/00
12:25:02
|
| Subject: re: Brains quantum
computer |
post id:
144764
|
Personally, I doubt whether
quantum-level processes are very important to the workings of the brain.
Essentially, I imagine the brain is similar to a classical
computer.
|
This forum is un-moderated. The views and opinions expressed are those of the individual
poster and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove offensive or
inappropriate messages.
|