| From: loulou ® | 13/09/2001
23:13:18 |
| Subject: aura photos | post id:
413240 |
| does anyone know how those aura
photos you can get done with the fuzzy glow around your body
work? are they picking up the heat being emitted from the subject? | |
| From: Meg ® | 13/09/2001
23:15:06 |
| Subject: re: aura photos | post id:
413245 |
| They did them with plants years
ago, cut the leaf in half then took a photo and you could still see the
outilne of where the leaf should have been. Is it a physics thing, do
living things emit some sort of energy, 'cause it wouldn't be too much
heat with a plant would it? -Meg | |
| From: MrPolitical | 13/09/2001
23:17:52 |
| Subject: re: aura photos | post id:
413249 |
| The object is subjected to a
large high frequency voltage and the current travels to earth through a
phosphor screen of some kind - which glows. The residual leaf affect is either fraudulent or caused by residual damage to the phosphor. | |
| From: Purple ® | 13/09/2001
23:19:08 |
| Subject: re: aura photos | post id:
413251 |
| It's called Kirlian
photography. I read somewhere about the photographer aligning it just so, and you have to stay still. Someone (like Philip Adams from memory) moved as the photo was taken and the aura was off centre. Something in the camera. I can't find the link now though. sorry. | |
| From: Peter B | 14/09/2001
16:25:34 |
| Subject: re: aura photos | post id:
414234 |
| Loulou The trick with aura photos is simple. It was discussed on a thread several months ago, but I'll leave it to someone else to link to that thread. Anyway, inside the camera are placed small coloured lights, red, green, blue, yellow, whatever, which can be switched on or off in any combination. The photographer chooses which lights to have on and off. When the photograph is taken, those lights which are on inside the camera show up as a coloured blur. It might take some practice to get the balance and brightness right, but at the price these photographers charge, they'd still make a useful little profit. | |