|
| From: bobonthejob |
8/04/00
13:58:54
|
| Subject: Mass and velocity |
post id:
54743
|
From what I understand, the
faster something travels, the heavier it gets. Right? Why exactly does
this occur? Does the rearrangement of the equation E=MC^2 to M=E/C^2
support this?
|
| From: B.C. |
8/04/00
14:07:32
|
| Subject: re: Mass and
velocity |
post id:
54744
|
As something moves it gains
energy- therefore it gets heavier as per the equation E=Mc2,it also gets
shorter in the direction of travel and time dilates.All this happens in
the view of someone in an outside reference frame.As for a person or
person moving at x velocity everything is as normal,in his own reference
frame.
|
| From: bobonthejob |
8/04/00
14:16:23
|
| Subject: re: Mass and
velocity |
post id:
54745
|
From the point of view, of
something travelling very fast, they are not moving but everything else
is. Does that mean everything else gets heavier?
|
| From: Robert |
8/04/00
15:02:31
|
| Subject: re: Mass and
velocity |
post id:
54748
|
It's all relative - it depends on
the frame of the measurer.
So, to answer this
question,
From the point of view, of something
travelling very fast, they are not moving but everything else is. Does
that mean everything else gets heavier?
The 'something'
will measure most things to be heavier than they would if their velocities
were equal. I believe this is called relativistic mass, and that it
is this which gets heavier with speed.
I think that's
right....
|
| From: bobonthejob |
8/04/00
15:44:40
|
| Subject: re: Mass and
velocity |
post id:
54752
|
If I were in a spaceship and I
was moving away from the earth close to the speed of light. It is said
that time would move slower for me than a person on earth. Hence the
"Planet of the apes" scenario. But how could this be true? Since relative
to the space ship it is the earth that is moving and consequently the
earth that would experience slower time.
|
| From: Grant¹ |
8/04/00
19:06:29
|
| Subject: re: Mass and
velocity |
post id:
54800
|
Check the FAQ on the twins
paradox & FTL travel.
|
| From: B.C. |
8/04/00
23:31:43
|
| Subject: re: Mass and
velocity |
post id:
55017
|
Yes thats the best advice,check
under F.T.L.Heres my down to earthexplanation anyway.If you are in the
space ship travelling at a good percentage of the speed of light,nothing
would change for you and your environments in the space ship.If you looked
back at your good mate back on earth,you would notice that time has
speeded up,and everthing is moving faster.Your friend on earth would not
perceive any difference or anything strange,withregards to his time
keeping,but if he looked up at you travelling at a good percentage of the
speed of light,he would notice that he would perceive everthing to be
slowing down.This is what is meant by relativity.The differences each
perceived in the others time rate would be bought to tthe fore when the
traveller returned to whence he came.To give an example if the traveller
travelled at 99.9999% the speed of light and returned,witha time frame
according to his clock of 12mths,the friend back on earth would be well
and truelly dead and buried with the earth based clock showing 250yrs down
the track!
|
| From: Chris
(Avatar) |
10/04/00
12:03:39
|
| Subject: re: Mass and
velocity |
post id:
55419
|
Hi Bob.
To understand
relativity, you need first to completely understand the concept of Frames
of Reference (FoR). In relativity frames of reference are distinguished by
velocity.
For example, suppose I am sitting in a car travelling
constantly at 60km/hr (so as to avoid Daryn's evildoer tax) north and I
throw a tennis ball out the passenger window at 50km/hr in the direction
I'm travelling (north). There are three frames of reference here. In the
frame of the road, the car is moving north at 60km/hr and the ball north
at 110km/hr. In the frame of the car, the car is still, the road is moving
south at 60km/hr and the ball is moving north at 50km/hr. In the frame of
the ball, the car is moving south at 50km/hr and the road is moving south
at 110km/hr.
Relativity tells us that provided all of these frames
are inertial, they're all equivalent. ie none is more "right" than
the other. What is important is that the way you observe and measure the
universe depends on your relative frame of reference. In the example
above, the answer to the simple question "How fast is the car going?"
depends on the FoR of the answerer: either 60km/hrnorth, 0km/hr, or
50km/hr south.
It turns out that our measurements of relative
velocity, distance and time intervals, energy and relativistic mass,
momentum, and other quantities depend on the frame in which we make them.
So let's look at mass/energy.
In order to make sense of mass, we
define the quantity "rest mass" to be the mass you measure in your own
frame of reference. This rest mass figure is the most useful, and so we
make the quantity invariant (by definition). But our measurments of mass
are frame dependant. If I rush past you at a speed which is a decent
fraction of the speed of light, you will measure my mass to be more than I
measure it to be. We call any mass measurement which is made from
outside the mass' rest frame the relativistic mass to
distinguish from the rest mass we defined above.
The two are
related in the following way:
mr =
mo / Ö (1 -
v2/c2 )
...where mr is
relativistic mass mo is rest mass v is the velocity of
the observer in frame r with respect to the mass and c is the
speed of light.
Notice that the factor Ö (1 - v2/c2 ) is called the
Lorentz transform and is a special rule for transforming from one
frame to another moving frame. You will find it pops up in the time
dilation and length contraction relations as well.
In the mass
relation, notice that when v=0 (ie in the rest frame), mr =
mo (as we would expect). However as v ® c, mr gets progressively larger. This is
the commonly understood result that relativistic mass tends to infinity as
velocity increases. However rest mass does not change, meaning that a
quickly travelling mass does not get "heavier" or eventually turn into a
black hole.
Hope this
helps! Chris
|
This forum is un-moderated. The views and opinions expressed are those of the
individual poster and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove
offensive or inappropriate messages.
|