|
| From: Brendan |
3/02/99
21:33:10
|
| Subject: Time dilation |
post id:
171
|
Can someone explain how time
dilation operates? I understand that it's a theoretical possibility
arising out of relativity theory, and describes how a physical body,
travelling at light speed (if that were possible) could "travel" through
time through the occurance of "dilation" - but I still haven't gotten my
head around the precise workings out.
Also, I'd like to know more
about the relationship between relativity theory and the Uncertainty
Principle and quantum mechanics. Did these latter two arise out of
relativity theory, or were they developed
seperately?
|
| From: Evan |
3/02/99
22:12:12
|
| Subject: re: Time dilation |
post id:
179
|
Relativity says that as an object
appraoches the speed of light, time for an observer on the object slows
down. That is if you took a ship to the stars, at the speed of light, to a
location 25 lights years away, turned around and came back at the speed of
light another 25 light years to the Earth, a person aboard such a ship
would have aged 50 years. But the Earth they returned to would have aged
some 50 thousand years. If you could talk via a radio to someone abord a
ship approaching the speed of light, moving away from the Earth, they
would appear to be talking more slowly and deeply, while to them, we on
the earth would appear to be talking more rapidly and at a higher pitch.
This is because for every hour that passes on the Earth, only a second may
have passed on the ship. If you've heard a train pass through a station,
perhaps sounding it's horn, it raises in pitch until it passes you, then
it starts to drop in pitch, as it moves away, it called the Doppler
effect.
|
| From: Evan |
3/02/99
22:12:43
|
| Subject: re: Time dilation |
post id:
180
|
Relativity says that as an object
appraoches the speed of light, time for an observer on the object slows
down. That is if you took a ship to the stars, at the speed of light, to a
location 25 lights years away, turned around and came back at the speed of
light another 25 light years to the Earth, a person aboard such a ship
would have aged 50 years. But the Earth they returned to would have aged
some 50 thousand years. If you could talk via a radio to someone abord a
ship approaching the speed of light, moving away from the Earth, they
would appear to be talking more slowly and deeply, while to them, we on
the earth would appear to be talking more rapidly and at a higher pitch.
This is because for every hour that passes on the Earth, only a second may
have passed on the ship. If you've heard a train pass through a station,
perhaps sounding it's horn, it raises in pitch until it passes you, then
it starts to drop in pitch, as it moves away, it called the Doppler
effect.
|
| From: Des |
3/02/99
23:07:15
|
| Subject: re: Time dilation |
post id:
182
|
The drawcard with the speed of
light discussions is of course people wish to travel back in time and
place a bet on the last Melbourne Cup (or some other self beneficial
action). Can you then (excuse my crude extrapolation of the time dilation
theory) travel faster than the speed of light and turn back the clock? I
seem to remember that in order to achieve light speed one needs to have no
mass, any theories on how to get less than zero mass?
antimatter?
|
| From: Bill Gates |
4/02/99
10:00:14
|
| Subject: re: Time dilation |
post id:
198
|
Accelerating a vehicle to the
speed of light! Relativity causing the Doppler effect! Einstien must
be turning in his grave!
|
| From: steve |
4/02/99
10:17:30
|
| Subject: re: Time dilation |
post id:
205
|
As far as I understand it (and
that is by no means extensive) the two theories (Relativity &
Uncertainty) were developed separately - the first by Einstein, the second
by Heisenberg, Bohr etc al.
The connection between Relativity and
Quantum Theory (of which Uncertainty is a component) is that inside the
nucleus of an atom particles travel around at extraordinary high speeds.
Because of this, Relativity plays a part in the calculations of mass,
energy etc and in interpretation of experimental results.
The thing
to keep in mind when thinking about sub-atomic physics is that nothing is
certain. Behaviour is described using probabilities rather than concrete
causal explanations.
For example, you cannot say that when a
positron collides with a neutron at speed x, then y will happen. Y will
happen with probability z, but a will happen with probability p
etc.
| This
forum is un-moderated. The views and opinions expressed are those of the
individual poster and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove
offensive or inappropriate messages.
| From: James Richmond |
4/02/99
11:42:14
|
| Subject: re: Time dilation |
post id:
252
|
Time dilation is an effect which
can be caused by relative motion or variation in the gravitational
field.
Relative motion. Consider a person in a spaceship
travelling at close to the speed of light, and a person on Earth watching
the spaceship speed past. The first point to make is that neither person
will notice anything unusual about the rate at which their subjective time
flows. However, if the Earth observer has a powerful telescope and can see
a clock in the spaceship, it will appear to be running slowly with respect
to Earth clocks. The situation works in reverse, too: the spaceship person
will see Earth clocks as running slower than spaceship clocks. The faster
the relative motion, the larger the time dilation effect. If the spaceship
could reach the speed of light (which is impossible for other reasons)
then each observer would see the other's clocks as stopped.
This
effect has nothing to do with the Doppler effect, and the above
explanation assumes that both observers correct for the time it takes
light to travel between them.
Another effect which goes hand in
hand with time dilation due to relative motion is length
contraction, by which moving objects shrink in the direction of
motion, as seen by a "stationary" observer.
Gravitational
variation. Gravitational time dilation is an effect due to curved
spacetime. Clocks higher up in a gravitational field are observed to run
faster than clocks lower down.
Both types of time dilation are not
just theoretical possibilities. They have been confirmed over and over
again in experiments.
|
| From: Jeremy |
4/02/99
12:10:28
|
| Subject: re: Time dilation |
post id:
274
|
Steve's summary is pretty good.
In fact all objects have a wave-function, and all moving objects are
subject to relativistic effects. It's just that as these objects become
slower and more macroscopic, the effects rapidly become negligible. In
other words, you could use relativistic equations to describe the motion
of the planets, but the difference against the result of using Newton's
would be imperceptible. (Notwithstanding Mercury in our own solar system
for example where the gravitational effect of the sun on the tiny planet
becomes measurable)
|
| From: Chris
(Avatar) |
4/02/99
13:20:40
|
| Subject: re: Time dilation |
post id:
300
|
Time
Dilation
…is not a "theoretical possibility", it is
a real effect. Time dilation is a consequence of the postulates of Special Relativity. It works like
this:
Consider a single light photon bouncing elastically between
two parallel mirrors. If you are in the same reference frame as the
photon, you see it bounce vertically up and down. However if the frame
with the two mirrors is moving past you at a speed v, then
you see it move forward as it bounces
In other words the path of
the photon is now zig-zagged, as the two mirrors move to the right. Ok, to
the stationary observer, the path length of the photon appears to have
increased. If the photon was a ball, then the apparent speed of the ball
to the stationary observer would be different which would account for the
different path length and times - however special relativity tells us that
all observers will observe the same speed of light, regardless of relative
motion.
What this means is that we must account for the discrepancy
in the path and time length by adjusting our "common sense" notions of
absolute space and time. This is done by applying a Lorentz transformation (a mathematical
operation) to the observations made by the "stationary"
observer.
The consequence is that if I imagine a frame moving past
me at velocity v, then I will observe a clock in that moving frame to
run slow (time dilation). This is simply
because observations of time and space depend on the observers motion with
respect to the target. In the frame of the clock, it will observe time to
run normally.
Importantly, time dilation occurs at all
velocities. In everyday velocities the effect is not noticeable, as
velocities approach the speed of light, the effect becomes more
noticeable.
Hope this helps!
Chris
|
This forum is un-moderated. The views and opinions expressed are those of the individual poster and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove offensive or inappropriate messages.
|