|
| From: Sue |
21/05/99
17:34:43
|
| Subject: Falling into a hole in a large
sphere |
post id:
13203
|
Sorry to repeat this, but now
this question has everyone here intrigued, and we'd like to add some
additional questions too!
If you had an earth-sized sphere, with
the same mass as the earth, and hypothetically it was solid throughout and
all at room temperature, and there was an elevator-shaft sized hole going
centrally from one side of this sphere to the other, and the hole had air
in it, and a person standing beside this hole jumped into it, where would
the person end up? The first part of the journey would be similar to
freefall, wouldn't it...but what would happen then? And would the person
necessarily be able to stay clear of the walls?
New related
questions:
1) What would be the differences between the above
scenario, and one where there was a vacuum in the hole? (assume the person
is wearing a spacesuit and will survive - I'm not asking a biology
question here :-)
2) Could you actually get air to be at STP in
such a hole, assuming the whole sphere was at room temperature, or would
differences in gravitational forces make that impossible?
3) And
could somebody explain to me what happens to the gravitational force as
you get closer to the centre of the sphere, and why?
4) If the
frictionless scenario enabled you to come to the surface at the other
side, would you be able to hold onto the edges of the hole and pull
yourself out of it to stop yourself falling back down again? Or couldn't
you come to the surface?
4) What would be the maximum velocity you
would reach in both scenarios (with friction, without friction)?
5)
How would your velocity change as you are travelling through this hole,
again comparing both scenarios?
Anyone got time for this? My
mind is boggling.
|
| From: Pete Mousley |
21/05/99
18:31:56
|
| Subject: re: Falling into a hole in a
large sphere |
post id:
13224
|
. Anyway, I
haven't really thought about it but here's my response: 1) If it were a
perfect vacuum and there were no friction from other sources then yes, in
a simple world you would just make it to the other side. However, if your
planet was a perfect sphere with perfect mass distribution, then there
would still be other influences, such as the gravitational pull from the
moon and other planets... (I'll leave that to someone else) 2) Depends
on your room temperature - think about it :) 3) Neglecting the outside
influences (the moon and other planets for example) the gravitational pull
at the centre of the tunnel would be equal in all directions. If you were
stopped at the centre of the tunnel you would stay there - gravitational
acceleration would be equal in all directions. Though it might pull you
apart... 4) You'd have to grab on pretty quick otherwise you might
spend a lot of time going back and forth! 4) (again! Is this you way of
making it seem as though you didn't have so many questions???) I'll let
someone else do the calculation for the frictionless senario (it is a
Friday night after all!) (though don't forget that acceleration due to
gravity is not constant!) As for the case with friction, with STP
conditions it would be similar to that experienced sky diving - the
terminal velocity, which depending on body size and position could be
between 150km/h and 250km/h. 5) In both cases you'd accelerate at a
decreasing rate. With friction, the increasing drag would cause your rate
of acceleration to decrease with speed, until your acceleration was zero
at your terminal velocity. Without friction, the reduction of your
acceleration would be caused by the reduction in acceleration due to
gravity as you moved through the tunnel, reaching zero acceleration at the
centre (where your velocity is maximum) and then your acceleration would
be an increasing negative (back towards the centre) as you moved from the
centre to the other side. Hope that makes some sort of sense. Your
final comment - I'm not surprised your mind is boggling! Go out and enjoy
your evening before they lock you up
:)
|
| From: Chris W (Plebeian) |
21/05/99
19:33:36
|
| Subject: re: Falling into a hole in a
large sphere |
post id:
13249
|
The Avatars have been a bit thin
on the ground today, but then they have a life too!
There are some
miscellaneous ramblings on this very topic here,
including JR and Chris.
|
| From: Terry Frankcombe |
21/05/99
23:11:17
|
| Subject: re: Falling into a hole in a
large sphere |
post id:
13284
|
OK sue. Though Pete had a good go
at it, here's my attempt to reinforce my reputation of someoone who's
interested in working out mindless details.
If you had an earth-sized sphere, with the same mass as
the earth, and hypothetically it was solid throughout and all at room
temperature, and there was an elevator-shaft sized hole going centrally
from one side of this sphere to the other, and the hole had air in it, and
a person standing beside this hole jumped into it, where would the person
end up? The first part of the journey would be similar to freefall,
wouldn't it...but what would happen then? And would the person necessarily
be able to stay clear of the walls?
The first part is almost
similar to freefall. The thing to remember is that as you drop below the
surface of your sphere the gravitational force decreases linearly with r
rather than increasing with the inverse of r squared, because suddenly you
start to be attracted graviatiationally upwards with all the mass
that is 'above' you. So you will pass the centre with less than your
normal terminal velocity. You'll probably pass through the centre, and
then stop somewhere between the centre and the surface and start heading
back to the middle. If your air resistance was high enough (low enough
'normal' terminal velocity) then you would never make it past the middel.
I can't work out the required integrals at the moment because I've just
come back form a DCS Smoko. Translation for non-UQ
chemistry students: I've been drinking.
If the person was
standing next to the hole and jumped in, then the exact details of the
drag on the person would determine whether they would hit the wall or not.
Lots of drag compared to the hole diameter then no, less drag/smaller hole
then yes. If they were suspended over the hole then they would not hit the
sides.
New related questions:
1) What
would be the differences between the above scenario, and one where there
was a vacuum in the hole? (assume the person is wearing a spacesuit and
will survive - I'm not asking a biology question here :-)
In
this case you would keep accelerating until you passed the middle, where
you would start decelerating. You would reach zero velocity at exactly the
same place (but oposite) as you jumped form on the opposite
side.
2) Could you actually get air to be at
STP in such a hole, assuming the whole sphere was at room temperature, or
would differences in gravitational forces make that
impossible?
My gut feeling is that something close to STP
throughout the hole would be possible, though I'll have to think about it
some more.
3) And could somebody explain to
me what happens to the gravitational force as you get closer to the centre
of the sphere, and why?
As I said, as you get closer to the
centre the gravitational force drops linearly with the distance from the
centre. Essentially what is happening is that the mass above you (less,
but closer) is balancing with the mass on the other side of the sphere
(more, but further away) so that the force you feel is the same as what
you would feel for a sphere of the same density and of radius equal to the
distance between you and the centre. If you do the intgrals it works
out.
4) If the frictionless scenario enabled
you to come to the surface at the other side, would you be able to hold
onto the edges of the hole and pull yourself out of it to stop yourself
falling back down again? Or couldn't you come to the
surface?
You would come to exactly the same place as you
left. If you jumped into the hole, then you would end up with your feet as
far out of the hole as they were when you started dropping on the other
side. Whether you could grab hold or not depends on whether you could have
grabbed hold or not on the other side when you were entering the hole. If
you were hanging by your fingertips on the other side before letting go
then you would be able to just get a grip with your fingertips on the
fallen-to side.
4) What would be the maximum
velocity you would reach in both scenarios (with friction, without
friction)?
Um, ask me again tomorrow. (see the original
question).
5) How would your velocity change
as you are travelling through this hole, again comparing both
scenarios?
Again, get back to me tomorrow!
Anyone got time for this? My mind is
boggling.
At this point I'd like to say that I hope you have
appreciuated my recent use of colour. I have endeavoured to not use the
same colour twice since you pointed out I always used
red!
|
| From: bob s |
22/05/99
6:18:43
|
| Subject: re: Falling into a hole in a
large sphere |
post id:
13390
|
I posted an answer to the sphere
with a hole and no air case elswhere. If there was air then the density of
the air would increase to a maximum at the center of the sphere The actual
density of the air would depend on the size of the sphere and depending on
the temperature could actually become liquid before the center was
reached. The drag in that case would possibly be high enough to cause your
motion to become almost zero as the center was approached. In that case
you would not pass the center by much. In the vacuum case the motion
conditions would be very similar to that of a pendulum.
|
| From: Sue |
24/05/99
11:08:49
|
| Subject: re: Falling into a hole in a
large sphere |
post id:
13512
|
Hi Terry!
Thanks for the
effort, looking forward to your additional thoughts. For when you do
those, actually, let me rephrase the STP question: I think I said 20
degrees C in my original question, should be 0 degrees C, I suspect. So if
you assume the sphere has a temperature of 0 degrees throughout, would it
necessarily follow (as that rogue seemed to suggest) that the atmosphere
inside the hole would therefore be at STP? I can't even get my mind around
a "gravity map" in such a sphere, let alone work out how that would affect
the characteristics of the atmosphere inside the hole. But I have this
hunch that it couldn't be homogeneous. What do you think?
Sue
|
| From: Terry Frankcombe |
25/05/99
1:01:09
|
| Subject: re: Falling into a hole in a
large sphere |
post id:
13636
|
Sue, I think you'll find that
that was not really red. The HTML gods have decreed that that colour is
infact 'orangered' :-P
As was pointed out by Dr Karl, you go
through the hole with SHM. This means your velocity (and position) vary
like a sine wave.
For the air case, I can't work out a solution.
For all you DE jocks out there, what's the general solution to damped
motion described by d2x/dt2 + a (dx/dt)2
+ b x =0? Or what is a transform that allows this to be transformed to a
normal damped free vibration equation?
I think bob was right.
Maintaining constant temperature, air pressure would increase as you
dropped below the surface. Probably the rate of pressure increase
with depth would decrease as you got deeper.
The SHM refered to
above is for a non-rotating sphere. If the sphere was rotating then you
could not avoid running into the wall without some external force. The
wall you would run into would be the one towards which the sphere is
rotating (ie the front wall of the
tunnel).
|
This forum is un-moderated. The views and opinions expressed are those
of the individual poster and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove
offensive or inappropriate messages.
|