|
|
| From: kelvin |
15/02/2000
1:12:00
|
| Subject: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
38493
|
Hi there
When a metal such
as iron is poured from the melt does it have a crystal structure and how
important is the nature of the pouring and the structure of the metal
influence the end use of the
metal?
Kelvin
|
| From: col |
15/02/2000
6:34:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
38503
|
As far as I know the metal only
starts to form crystals as it cools,just like water freezing.It is the
manipulation of these crystals as the metal cools(by rolling,hammer
forgeing etc)that gives different properties,
eg.strength,hardness,workability etc.These properties are also influenced
by various other things like addatives, heat treatment and other metals
present as alloys.
|
| From: Alan™ |
15/02/2000
8:11:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
38505
|
Kelvin, I'll give a complete
answer when I get home from work. But douring pouring the metal is cooling
and as a result some nucleation and crystallisation is occurring. The
mechanical properties are effected by the
pour.
|
| From: Brendan |
15/02/2000
10:22:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
38518
|
Hi Kelvin,
The
crystallisation of iron is different for the different types of iron, pig
iron, cast iron etc, will have different impurities in them. Not much of a
memory on this but as far as I can remember the strongest steel is grown
as one crystal therefore increasing it's strength. So I assume it also has
something to do with the cooling rate.
|
| From: Alan™ |
15/02/2000
20:22:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
38723
|
And now for the more complete
answer.
When a metal such as iron is poured
from the melt does it have a crystal structure?
I assume you
remember some of your phase diagrams from your course and the did show you
a temperature vs composition for a binary system. I know you hated them
from an earlier post.
The solidification for a pure metal will be
higher than a final temperature of solidification for an alloy. But the
starting point for the solidifaction will start of the alloy will be the
same temperature as the pure metal as the first material to solidify will
be pure. As the temperature decreases the composition will change until
the eutectic composition is reached.
The other thing to look at is
what causes the crystallisation. Within the liquid metal you'll often find
solid precititates that are sites for nucleation. Sometimes these sites
will be the walls of the container holding the metal. Once the temperature
of the liquid reaches the solidification temperature. Crystallisation will
begin on the nucleation sites.
So to answer to answer your
question, more than likely unless the material is poured at a temperature
much higher than the solidification temperature and the atmosphere is also
very hot, so that the metal doesn't begin to crystallise until in the
mould.
and how important is the nature of the
pouring and the structure of the metal influence the end use of the
metal?
This area can become critical. Probably not so much
with continuous casting, but definitely when pouring into moulds, but
probably not the way your thinking.
The problem really lies with
the introduction of trapped gas bubbles, impurities and surface oxidation.
This oxidation occurs when ever the liquid metal is in contact oxygen (or
air). THus top pouring into a mould is going to give a lot of surface
contact. Amongst the better casters, they tend to pour the melt into a
reservoir, which allows the oxides, bubble and impurities to rise and then
pour through the bottom of the mould using an argon gas shroud.
These types of impurites, oxides and gas bubbles, result in
similar faults which can cause the cracks to initiate and hence premature
failure.
Continuous casting also uses very deep reservoirs which
allow the above problems to float to the top.
The speed of cooling
also significantly effects the crystal structure of the material and the
final structure of the solid crystal, as you can form meta stable crystal
structures, because there wasn't time to form the stable equilibrium
structure. This can also be achieved by reheating the material up to a
significant temperature (this depends on the metal).
Each
structure will have different mechanical properties (plus's and minus's).
Its the mechanical properties that really control the end use. You have to
choose the right material for the right application.
In addition
faster cooling will result in smaller crystals. These actually tend have
higher strength and hardness. Slowly grown single crystals have very good
creep resistance.
|
| From: kelvin |
16/02/2000
0:56:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
38860
|
Hi there
thanks for the
answer. it enlightened me immensley. I am not so anti phase diagram but
they are not my favourite things in life.
So how are the metals
used in high temperture and precision environments such as the space
shuttle different from those in my back shed -assuming we use the same
metals in the construction?
Ta
kelvin
|
| From: Alan™ |
16/02/2000
8:16:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
38892
|
Again, I'll answer your question
tonight. It all depends on the alloying elements you use. Using oxides to
protect the metal substrate, is the principle
way.
|
| From: Alan™ |
17/02/2000
21:53:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
39592
|
OK let’s try this
again.
The general run of the mill metals that you find around
your house etc, generally come from about two dozen different alloys.
These alloys are mass produced and have generally good properties all
round. This includes all your steels, aluminiums, copper/brass/ bronzes,
and a few other common ones.
As you move into harsher environments,
be that from a wear, corrosion, temperature etc, you require more
specialized alloys, to handle these environments. These materials are
generally available, but sometimes it will involve a special run at the
manufactures. The consequence is that these materials will have some very
good properties that are required but other non-essential properties are
sacrificed.
When you get into extreme conditions, you then have to
tailor the materials for the specific purpose. A material that is suitable
for pumping high-pressure steam may not be suitable is that in another
case is the stream at the same pressure and temperature, if that steam was
to have a Ph of 6 because of a high concentration of sulfuric acid. Yet if
the steam was caustic neither of the other two alloys may be
suitable.
So how do they come up with these
materials?
Well if we look at just a simple binary carbon steel
(just iron and carbon). This material may have reasonable properties,
nothing to fancy. (Note that almost all steel alloys are more complex but
....)
An addition of chromium to this base material will have
several effects. The chromium reacts with the carbon and effectively
reduces the carbon content. At the crystal level the body centered cubic
(BCC) structure known as ferrite, field is enlarged, while the face
centered cubic (FCC) structure known as austenite, field is reduced.
Further there is a chemical reaction between the chromium and atmospheric
oxygen that forms a stable oxide on the surface. This oxide layer protects
the steel from forming "rust" and if the oxide layer is damaged the oxide
layer will reform usually. By the way we just formed a ferric stainless
steel (430, etc). Or the martensitic group (similar composition, but due
to the heat treatment are a different crystal structure) (403, 410 etc)
The addition of nickel into the alloy, will improve the strength,
but it will permit the further addition of chromium. The nickel forces the
carbon back into the iron, which means that the austenite structure is
formed. You still get the chromium oxide layer and all the pluses there,
with some better mechanical properties. This is an austenitic stainless
steel (304. etc).
If you were to increase the chromium content you
would move into a region where both austenite and ferrite would co-exist.
This is a special range of alloys known as duplex stainless steels
(Sandvic’s 2304, 2507 etc) these alloys have much better ductility because
of the duplex nature and corrosion resistance because of the extra
chromium.
Going back to the austenic stainless steel, if you were
to add small amounts of molybdenum into the mix, the resistance to high
temperature creep resistance is improved. Creep is a process where over a
period of time the material elongates permanently below the yield point,
ie still in the elastic region. (316 grade austenitic stainless).
Aluminium can also be added in higher temperature alloys for creep
resistance, these begin to have specific trade names.
Alternatively titanium, tantalum or can be added to improve the
materials weldability.
I've delibrately kept within the
stainless steel group. As it is one of the moderate temperature
alloys.
So now you have an alloy containing 5 - 6 different
elements. If you now perceive that the material still a weakness, that may
effect the usage of the material, you might add some more of something or
a different element. Some elements ma have a very strong influence others
a weak influence, some may have a limitation in how much you can add
before a new crystal structure is formed that is detrimental, or its
addition causes the loss of another property.
In the super alloys
for high temperature applications, there can be 30 or more different
alloying elements. To see the actual composition, you are left dumbfounded
how anybody could have come up with something so complex. It’s a bit like
a witches brew, "2 bats wings, 3 toes of frogs, eye of newt".
They
are designed in such a way that the metal initially corrodes forming an
oxide layer that is designed not to lift off but remains firmly attached.
The actual oxide is probably described as being more like a ceramic than a
metal. But supposedly* each element is there for a specific purpose to
give or counteract a certain property. I should mention that the high
temerature alloys tend to eliminate iron from the compostion, instead the
base of the material is nickel and cobalt.
* Actually, I
personally think the say, "well nobody else has ever
u
|
| From: Alan™ |
17/02/2000
21:56:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
39594
|
* Actually, I personally think
the say, "well nobody else has ever used ‘Xx’ before, lets throw a bit in
and say it does something wonderful so we can then charge 20% more. Even
some of the fairly common exotic alloys can cost $US1000 per
kilogram.
How does that all
sound?
|
| From: kelvin |
18/02/2000
0:40:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
39640
|
Hi Allen
Thanks for that
great answer. I therefore gather that metals will crystallize in the cubic
system rather than in any of the other 6 crystal systems?
With
respect to alloys are they strict crystal structures in the same way
minerals are ie in terms of where each atom sits in the crystal structure
or are they more random in structure ie can you make a ball and stick
model of say a chrome, molly, nickel, vanadium iron
alloy?
Kelvin
|
| From: Alan™ |
19/02/2000
0:18:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
39925
|
Sorry for being abit slack in
replying. We've just moved offices and my area is the largest of the lot
(actually the same size as all the others combined and I have all the
stock. And everybody's been posting too much in the last few days. I've
just read 2 1/2 days worth of posts.
I
therefore gather that metals will crystallize in the cubic system rather
than in any of the other 6 crystal systems?
They do occur in
the other 6 crystal systems. But fortunately for metallurgists almost all
the useful ones come in three different structures, FCC, BCC and Close
packed hexagonal. Gee I hated sterographic projections
With respect to alloys are they strict
crystal structures in the same way minerals are ie in terms of where each
atom sits in the crystal structure or are they more random in structure ie
can you make a ball and stick model of say a chrome, molly, nickel,
vanadium iron alloy?
Generally yes, they are strict crystal
structures and yes we did use the ball and stick models, but that was more
when we were starting to learn about dislocations. I assume in geology
/ mineralogy you'd use a similar term for crystal faults which appear as
line faults.
The reason why I said generally is a seem to
remember that carbon in low concentrations can appear in intersticial
sites. They disturb the crystal structure but don't go into the latice
sites. If I'm right on this (I'll check up tomorrow), it will also be
occuring to some extent in many alloys. But the vanadium, chromium, molly
and nickel would all be substituted into the lattice structure.
I'm
fallingasleep here. I'll post this and then make any technical corrections
tomorrow.
|
| From: Alan™ |
19/02/2000
13:01:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
40014
|
OK, I'm awake and ready to go
zzzzzzzzzzz. I'm happy with the first part of my answer. But a bit more
detail could be included in the second part.
With respect to alloys are they strict crystal structures
in the same way minerals are ie in terms of where each atom sits in the
crystal structure or are they more random in structure ie can you make a
ball and stick model of say a chrome, molly, nickel, vanadium iron
alloy?
Generally yes, they are strict
crystal structures and yes we did use the ball and stick models, but that
was more when we were starting to learn about dislocations. I assume in
geology / mineralogy you'd use a similar term for crystal faults which
appear as line faults.
The reason why I said generally is a seem to
remember that carbon in low concentrations can appear in intersticial
sites. They disturb the crystal structure but don't go into the latice
sites. If I'm right on this (I'll check up tomorrow), it will also be
occuring to some extent in many alloys. But the vanadium, chromium, molly
and nickel would all be substituted into the lattice
structure.
After a quick glance few a few text. There are
two groups of impurities. One group are the substitional which would tend
to be atoms of similar size, ie Ni, Mo, Cr, V. The other group are the
intersticial. These would be the smaller atoms as they disrupt the
latticel structure less, carbon in low concentrations, in an iron crystal
structure. But if that carbon concenraction was higher the carbon would
occur in the lattice positions in a new crystal structure based upon
Fe3C or cementite (but I can't locate the actual crystal
structure).
The other thing that should be metions is distortion in
the lattice structure, not just by individual atoms but by precipitates.
These may be a completely different crystal structure to the rest of the
crystal, and may only fit in by distorting the lattice structure around
it.
|
| From: kelvin |
20/02/2000
1:45:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
40294
|
Thanks again Alan
I
therfore guess that the main role of non -ferrous metals is to change the
properties of the iron by changing the crystal properties?
What
happens in the case of electroplating? How do the crystals of say the zinc
compound 'stick" to the existing ferrous compound.? I guess we are
entering the heady world of
electochemistry?
kelvin
|
| From: Alan™ |
20/02/2000
20:10:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
40396
|
I therfore
guess that the main role of non -ferrous metals is to change the
properties of the iron by changing the crystal properties?
I
hope you mean alloying elements and not non ferrous. You'll get into
trouble when dealing with aluminium alloys or any other non ferrous
alloys.
But yes, the main purpose of alloying elements, is to
change the properties of the base metal, by changing the crystal
structure.
What happens in the case of
electroplating? How do the crystals of say the zinc compound 'stick" to
the existing ferrous compound.? I guess we are entering the heady world of
electochemistry?
I think Di & Dr Ed might be able to
give you a better answer. But from memory there is some substitution of
the atoms within the surface layer of the substrate and the plating. It's
more than just a physical bond, it's also a chemical bond. My course was
really weak in this area, even though my speciality is
anodising.
|
| From: kelvin |
21/02/2000
0:59:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
40521
|
Hi there
If this is
starting to become monotenous please tell me so.
I guess the
physical properties of teh metal eg malleability and melting temperature
are a direct function of the crystal structures involved?
In
geology we use the idea of differentiation during cooling of a melt ie
higher temperature minerals crystallize before lower temperature phases eg
pyroxenex will crystallise before quartz. Does a similar thing happen in a
metals melt ie do nickel compounds crystallise before say chromium or
tungsten compounds?
kelvin
|
| From: Alan™ |
22/02/2000
22:11:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41155
|
I guess
the physical properties of teh metal eg malleability and melting
temperature are a direct function of the crystal structures
involved?
Well the answer is yes. But it seems to simple to
just say yes.
Crystal structures can be manipulated in so many
ways, heat treatment, mechanical working, cooling cycle, ageing, particle
precipitation, grain size etc.
In geology
we use the idea of differentiation during cooling of a melt ie higher
temperature minerals crystallize before lower temperature phases eg
pyroxenex will crystallise before quartz. Does a similar thing happen in a
metals melt ie do nickel compounds crystallise before say chromium or
tungsten compounds?
I'm actually having to think about this.
OK, Yes.
Generally you want small percipitates in metallurgy (gross
generalization but accurate enough) to obtain these, they generally design
the material so that these percipitates can form by reheating the
material, without melting then. This occurs by diffusion.
A few
years ago, I was working with a material which in theory could be
manufactured (it definately could be cast) but the manufacturer was using
a special technique, for solidify the metal, while this was happening they
were keeping the liquid homogenous by stirring it. If they had attempted
to cast it, the various alloying elements would have come out of solution
and solidified.
|
| From: kelvin |
23/02/2000
0:44:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41204
|
Hi Alan
Thanks for that
info.
Is it posible to make a lightweight metal by bubbling air
through the melt during solidification from the
melt?
kelvin
Ps I habe no idea on why I have this sudden
fascination with metals
|
| From: Alan™ |
23/02/2000
9:42:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41222
|
Is it
posible to make a lightweight metal by bubbling air through the melt
during solidification from the melt?
Yes it is possible to
do this, but if any oxygen was in the air (pretty usual one would hope :-)
) this would result in the metal oxidizing at high temperature causing
inclusions etc, which would weaken the material. You could attempt the
same thing using nitrogen.
My thoughts here really is why. It would
be very difficult to control where the bubbles ended up in the metal. You
would end up structures that did not have consistant properties, say all
the bubbles occurred at one end of a sheet or in a particular section. The
result would be the material would be very weak in that
region.
There are however alternatives. Metal honeycombes exist, a
25 mm thick honeycombe structure with sheet material over the top will
give you a material which is all most as strong as 25 mm thick plate, but
with only a small percentage of the mass. These materials are used
extensively in the aircraft industry.
Engineering design will
often think about ways to make a structure lighter. Think of the classic
structural "I" beam. Or just using thinner sections
The other
aspect to this is that their are a huge range of materials out there.
Titanium has a strength to weight ratio of steel that is 3 to 1. In other
words you can achieve the same strength for a third of the weight. I think
the figures are the same for magnesuim alloys and titanium
alloys.
Ps I habe no idea on why I have
this sudden fascination with metals
I've had it for years.
When you've scene the grain structures under a microscope, you start
seeing the same structures as patterns on cloth etc. Gee, she's wearing
a widmanstatten plate stucture.
Isn any one else following
this thread other than Kelvin and myself?
|
| From: kelvin |
23/02/2000
18:39:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41376
|
Hi there
you have once
again answered the question beautifully. I was thinking of the bubbles as
a way of making aircraft and race car structures.
Whay does Niobium
and the other exotic meatls do to a ferrous melt and to the properties of
the final material?
kelvin
|
| From: Alan™ |
24/02/2000
23:42:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41830
|
Whay does
Niobium and the other exotic meatls do to a ferrous melt and to the
properties of the final material?
Big question this one,
since 2/3 of all the elements are metals and all but half a dozen or are
exotic. Also I don't have my hands on that much information.
To the
melt they virtually make no difference. They may or may not effect the
solidification temperature to a small extent. The will also cause shifts
in the various solidification lines.
WRT the physical properties of
the material to some extent I've covered most of this question already.
Because of the shape of the iron carbon diagram, you have a couple of
different situations. You have some elements which cause the ferrite
sregion to be larger or the austenite region to be larger. Some elements
react with the carbon causing carbides, graphite being precipitated or to
assist the carbon to remain in the interstitial sites.
Other
things happening, are the size of the atoms in the interstitial and
substitutional atoms and the effect of how dislocation move through the
structure.
Niobium, when comined with carbon (NbC4) or
nitrogen 3 results in precipitates in the austenite phase.
During hot working (ie rolling the material at high temperature) the
precipitates inhibit the grains of austenite recrystallising. Thus the
resulting crystals are smaller and the material with the percipitates
still present, when subsequently cold rolled they produce an extremely
high strength material.
I'd hate to think I'm burning you off, I
just don't have that much info in this area on specific elements. As I'm
enjoying this thread. :-)
I have found an additional bit of
information. Microalloying of carbon steels, form a group of materials
known as High strength, low alloy steels (HSLA). The strengthening
mechanisms used in this group of alloys are grain refinement,
precipitation of carbides, nitrides etc, effects to dislocation structure,
solid solution strengthening and strain aging. With careful heat treatment
you can control the final crystal structure and form meta-stable crystal
structures.
|
| From: kelvin |
25/02/2000
1:02:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41839
|
Hi Alan
Thanks for that
answer. Here are 2 more questions to think about. I assume that the
crystal size in most metals is small. I cannot see any crystals with my
hand lens when I look at the kitchen sink. however when I look at a bit of
thin tinplate behind the shed I see a regular "graininess' to the texture.
i had assumed this graininess reflected the crystal structure. Is this
true/
What happens when you cool a metal melts melt really fast? do
you get a glass?
having
fun Kelvin
|
| From: Alan™ |
25/02/2000
1:49:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41846
|
I assume that
the crystal size in most metals is small. I cannot see any crystals with
my hand lens when I look at the kitchen sink. however when I look at a bit
of thin tinplate behind the shed I see a regular "graininess' to the
texture. i had assumed this graininess reflected the crystal structure. Is
this true?
Often the grains are bigger than you realise. At
one stage (I'm not sure how popular it is currently) jet turbine blades
were single crystals. Galvanised (rather than tin plate) metal are often
fairly visible because of the slow cooling rates. Most crystals are small,
less than half a mm.
But why you can't generally see them is
because of the reflection / smoothness on the surface. We often use
combinations of acids or oxidising agents to etch the surface of the
metal. Etching of the surface allows the different phases to be
identified. For aluminium I used HF acid during my thesis. Nitric and
Picric acid are both used for steel.
What
happens when you cool a metal melts melt really fast? do you get a
glass?
Yes, you can end up with metal glasses. Think about
your cassette tapes, the metal ones are actually an iron silicon alloy
that is actually a glass..
The rate of cooling has a significant
effect on the final structure observed. The actual rate will depend upon
the alloy involved. There are also often several other crystal stures
possible before you reach the amorphous glass material. In a carbon steel,
it goes something like ferrite, bainite, martensite and then the amorphous
material. Bainite and martensite have been meta-stable crystals, I've
mentioned earlier.
|
| From: kelvin |
25/02/2000
2:04:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41855
|
Ok
Does adding non ferric
components change the magnetic properties of the final metal
product?
kelvin
|
| From: Alan™ |
25/02/2000
7:53:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
41879
|
Does adding
non ferric components change the magnetic properties of the final metal
product?
Potentially, as only the BCC ferrite crystalline
product is magnetic. Thus is you add alloyinging elements that cause the
production of austenite, then the material will be non
magnetic.
|
| From: kelvin fox |
24/03/2000
8:53:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
49739
|
Hi Alan
With respect to
crystal structure, how does making a wire from metal effect the crystal
structure of the metal?
Kelvin
|
| From: David Brennan |
24/03/2000
9:46:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
49745
|
Generally speaking it streches
the grains of the metal in the longitundinal direction of the wire ie
along it length. The leads to increased strength in this direction and
depending on the material work hardening of the material. This is
sometimes called mechanical
fibreing.
David
|
| From: Alan™ |
24/03/2000
11:20:00
|
| Subject: re: Metals
Manufacture |
post id:
49776
|
The crystal structure becomes
really elongated in the direction of the length of the wire. Depending
upon the type of material bring drawn (pulled) into wire, this can become
a real problem because of work hardening (remember the dislocations I
mentioned earlier). If the wire work hardens to much, the wire will break
during latter drawing processes.
With most materials and depending
on how fine the wire is, they reheat (anneal) the wire, to allow the
material to recrystallize, this eliminates the work hardening. Depending
on how hard their want the wire, they will anneal the wire at various
stages during the process ie a soft wire will be annealled when the wire
has been drawn to the final thickness, but a hard wire will be annealled
much earlier in the drawing process.
|
This forum is un-moderated. The views and opinions expressed are those
of the individual poster and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove
offensive or inappropriate messages.
|